• Propmodo Daily
  • Posts
  • U.S. Industrial Market Finds Its Footing After Years of Adjustment

U.S. Industrial Market Finds Its Footing After Years of Adjustment

Wednesday, January 14, 2026

On Tap Today

  • Supply sigh: After a bruising three-year slide, the industrial real estate market is finally finding its footing.

  • Exit fee: Bill Ackman wants to cut mortgage rates by making it harder for homeowners to refinance or pay off their loans early.

  • Build bigly: Trump aims to cut housing costs by pushing cities to build more, faster, with federal money tied to zoning and permitting reform.

Presented by Harvard

For most real estate leaders, AI still hasn’t changed daily work. Spreadsheets, gut instinct, and legacy systems remain the norm, leaving a major opportunity for professionals who move first.

Harvard GSD Executive Education’s live online program, AI, Machine Learning, and the Built Environment, helps you turn untapped potential into daily practice.

Over three online sessions, you will:

  • Build a practical, non-technical foundation in AI and machine learning.

  • Collaborate with global peers on an industry application relevant to your role.

  • Learn from industry leaders pioneering AI in the built environment.

Join us at Harvard this March.

MarkerValueDaily Change
S&P 500 (Index)6,977.41▲ 13.14 (+0.19%)
FTSE Nareit (All Equity REITs)766.23▲ 9.22 (+1.22%)
U.S. 10-Year Treasury Yield4.18%▲ 0.01 ppt (+0.24%)
SOFR (overnight)3.64%▼ 0.00 ppt (0.00%)
Data as of January 13, 2026.

Industrial

After three years of turbulence, the U.S. industrial market is finally showing signs that it has stopped drifting. Savills’ latest Q4 2025 data points to a subtle but important shift: vacancy is no longer climbing, and the supply-demand equation is starting to feel more balanced than bloated.

That does not mean a boom is coming back. Rents are barely moving, tenants are cautious, and a huge amount of space is still working its way through the system. But beneath the surface, key indicators like absorption and sublease space are beginning to stabilize in ways that typically mark the end of a downshift.

The question now is not how bad things will get, but what this next, calmer phase looks like. With construction pulling back, landlords prioritizing occupancy, and occupiers finishing their right-sizing, the industrial sector may be entering a slower, steadier cycle that favors discipline over exuberance.

Overheard

Billionaire investor Bill Ackman has pitched an unusual idea to lower U.S. mortgage rates: require prepayment penalties on new home loans, making it more costly to pay off or refinance early. He argues that if borrowers give up the right to prepay without penalty, lenders and buyers of mortgage-backed securities would accept lower yields, potentially shaving about 0.65 percentage points off current 30-year rates around 6.16 percent. In essence, cutting early exit rights could trade flexibility for a lower long-term cost of borrowing.

Prepayment penalties were once common and remain standard in some mortgage markets overseas, but they largely disappeared from conventional U.S. 30-year fixed mortgages because free prepayment rights are a key feature of the market, especially for government-backed loans. Mortgage buyers and agency investors typically charge higher spreads when loans can be refinanced or paid off early, because prepayment risk makes cash flows less predictable. By making early payoff harder, Ackman believes the risk premium built into rates could shrink, lowering ongoing borrowing costs for many buyers.

If adopted, the idea would ripple across real estate finance. Lower headline mortgage rates could lift homebuying in an affordability-strained market, while limits on prepayment would reshape refinancing, MBS liquidity, and risk across lenders, investors, and borrowers. With refinance activity dampened, mobility and turnover would slow, forcing institutions to reprice risk. At its core, the proposal exposes a deeper tension between stabilizing mortgage markets and preserving flexibility for homeowners.

In a policy pivot on housing affordability, President Trump rolled out a broad suite of proposals meant to ease the cost of homes and rentals. The agenda covers everything from zoning and permitting reform to tax incentives, regulatory pruning and financing adjustments designed to accelerate housing supply and make ownership and renting more attainable. These proposals shine a federal spotlight on housing supply constraints and cost drivers that have ballooned over the past decade.

Among the proposals likely to have the most direct impact on real estate is a push to overhaul zoning and land-use rules, particularly at the local level. Trump’s plan calls for tying certain federal infrastructure dollars to municipal permitting performance, effectively incentivizing cities and counties to loosen restrictive zoning, reduce needless process delays and approve more housing developments. This could unlock new single-family and multifamily supply in markets still reeling from underproduction, potentially moderating price escalation and lowering rent growth over time. Regions where local regulation has been most restrictive may see increased development activity as capital and homebuilders respond to policy encouragement.

Other elements of the plan include expanding tax incentives for the development of affordable housing and providing more tax-efficient mechanisms for private investment in workforce housing. The proposals also emphasize trust in streamlined environmental reviews and quicker approval paths for projects that meet certain affordability benchmarks. If implemented, these could improve project pro formas in historically constrained markets where long lead times and costly entitlements erode returns and deter builders.

These federal signals might finally begin to influence local behavior on zoning, permitting, and infrastructure prioritization. Developers could accelerate entitlement and construction planning in anticipation of a more hospitable national policy backdrop, and lenders might adjust risk models if permitting risk begins to abate. While the details and timelines of any legislation remain uncertain, the emphasis on supply, permitting incentives, and affordability-linked federal funding could reshape housing development economics in the years ahead.

Popular Articles

Are You Enjoying This Newsletter?

Propmodo Daily is written and edited by Franco Faraudo with contributions from readers like you and the Propmodo team.

📧 Forward it to a friend and suggest they check it out.

🔗 Share a link to this post on social media.

🗣 Have ideas for future topics (or just want to say hello)? Share your feedback and tips at [email protected] or connect with us on X through @propmodo.

✅ Not subscribed yet? Sign up for this newsletter here.

📫️ Please add our newsletter email, [email protected], to your contacts to make sure you don’t miss any updates.

Enjoy reading about trends and innovation in commercial real estate? Subscribe to Propmodo.com for unrestricted access to reliable, data-driven journalism and exclusive insights available only to subscribers.